The Intersection of Travel Rule and GDPR: Navigating Data Protection Challenges

As the cryptocurrency industry continues to expand, so does the regulatory scrutiny surrounding it. One of the most impactful regulations to emerge in recent years is the FATF Travel Rule. While its intent is to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing, its implementation raises complex challenges, particularly with respect to data protection laws such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union. This article explores how virtual asset service providers (VASPs) can navigate the intersection of the Travel Rule and GDPR while ensuring compliance and protecting customer privacy.

Table of Contents

• Understanding the FATF Travel Rule
• GDPR Overview: Protecting Customer PII
• The Core Conflict: Data Sharing vs. Data Protection
• Legal Basis for Data Sharing Under GDPR
• Key Challenges in Cross-Border Data Transfers
• Due Diligence and Record-Keeping Obligations
• Implementing a Travel Rule Solution
• Aligning with a Risk-Based Approach
• Industry Collaboration and Regulatory Clarity

Understanding the FATF Travel Rule

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) introduced the Travel Rule as part of its recommendations for combating money laundering and terrorist financing. Under this rule, virtual asset service providers must share certain customer data during virtual asset transfers.

Key Requirements:

• VASPs must collect and transmit the originator's account number and beneficiary's account number.

• The name, address, and customer identification number of both the originator and the beneficiary must be shared.

• Transaction details must accompany the transfer and be available to financial institutions involved.

This regulation brings the crypto industry closer to the compliance obligations traditionally followed by banks and financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and other frameworks.

GDPR Overview: Protecting Customer PII

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is designed to protect the personal identifiable information (PII) of individuals within the European Union. GDPR regulates how personal data is collected, stored, processed, and transferred.

Key GDPR Principles:

• Data minimization

• Purpose limitation

• Data subject rights

• Lawful basis for processing

• Accountability and transparency

The challenge arises when VASPs operating in the EU must comply with both the FATF Travel Rule and GDPR. The former mandates the collection and sharing of customer data, while the latter restricts the very same practice.

The Core Conflict: Data Sharing vs. Data Protection

The FATF Travel Rule requires VASPs to transmit personal and transaction data to the recipient's financial institution, next financial institution, or intermediary financial institution. However, under GDPR, transmitting such data across borders without proper safeguards may violate user privacy rights.

This raises several important questions:

• Can the data sharing required by the Travel Rule be justified under GDPR's legitimate interest clause?

• How should VASPs handle data subject access requests?

• What are the security obligations when transmitting data under the Travel Rule?

Legal Basis for Data Sharing Under GDPR

VASPs must ensure they have a lawful basis under GDPR to process and share customer data. Several potential bases include:

• Legal obligation: If national laws require compliance with the FATF Travel Rule, this may suffice.

• Legitimate interest: VASPs may argue that data sharing is necessary to prevent money laundering and ensure financial stability.

• Consent: This is generally not practical or reliable for compliance purposes.

However, VASPs must also respect data minimization and purpose limitation principles, sharing only the data strictly necessary for Travel Rule compliance.

Key Challenges in Cross-Border Data Transfers

Many VASPs operate globally, which adds complexity when transferring data to jurisdictions that may not provide an adequate level of data protection as defined by the European Commission.

Solutions to Explore:

• Standard contractual clauses (SCCs)

• Binding corporate rules (BCRs)

• Risk-based approach to data sharing and minimization

To mitigate risks, VASPs must also ensure that technical and organizational measures are in place to secure the data during transit.

Due Diligence and Record-Keeping Obligations

VASPs are considered obliged entities and must carry out due diligence to identify and verify customers. This includes collecting customer PII, transaction information, and conducting risk assessments to detect suspicious transactions.

Obligations:

• Maintain records of virtual asset transactions

• Report suspicious activities to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) or other competent authorities

• Retain data for a minimum period (typically five years)

Record-keeping must be performed in compliance with GDPR, including secure storage, limited access, and eventual deletion.

Implementing a Travel Rule Solution

To ensure compliance, many VASPs are turning to Travel Rule solutions that can:

• Encrypt and securely transmit transaction data

• Automate customer identity verification

• Log and monitor compliance efforts

These tools must support interoperability with other systems and comply with both FATF guidelines and GDPR technical standards.

One notable solution is MarketGuard, a RegTech platform designed for crypto businesses. MarketGuard provides:

• Automated Travel Rule compliance

• Risk-based monitoring

• Cross-border data transfer safeguards

• GDPR-friendly encryption and storage

Aligning with a Risk-Based Approach

The risk-based approach advocated by FATF and GDPR enables VASPs to prioritize resources based on the risk profile of a transaction. For example, a small VA transfer between two verified users may be considered low-risk, whereas a large cross-border transaction to a high-risk jurisdiction may require enhanced due diligence.

This approach helps minimize false positives, reduce operational risk, and improve the customer experience while ensuring compliance.

Industry Collaboration and Regulatory Clarity

Industry stakeholders, including VASPs, regulators, and technical providers, must collaborate to:

• Standardize messaging protocols for Travel Rule data

• Define minimum requirements for beneficiary information

• Promote interoperable solutions that respect privacy by design principles

Regulators also need to clarify how the Travel Rule should be applied under local regulations and in DeFi contexts or when interacting with custodian wallet providers.

Conclusion

The intersection of the FATF Travel Rule and GDPR highlights the delicate balance between ensuring regulatory compliance and protecting customer privacy. VASPs must tread carefully, implementing robust technical solutions, conducting detailed risk assessments, and working with legal experts to ensure full compliance.

Solutions like MarketGuard are leading the way in helping crypto businesses navigate this complex landscape by offering secure, scalable, and privacy-aware Travel Rule compliance platforms. As the virtual asset industry continues to evolve, the ability to manage this intersection will be a key differentiator for trusted and compliant VASPs operating in a global regulatory environment.

For more information about how we can help reach out to us. We're here to help and answer any questions you may have.

Contact us!

***

References

• Financial Action Task Force (FATF). (2023). Targeted Update on Implementation of the FATF Standards on Virtual Assets and VASPs. https://www.fatf-gafi.org

• Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). (2020). Funds “Travel” Rule (31 CFR 1010.410(f)) – Bank Secrecy Act. https://www.fincen.gov

• European Commission. (2023). Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA). https://finance.ec.europa.eu

• ComplyAdvantage. (2024). What is the FATF Travel Rule? https://complyadvantage.com/insights/fatf-travel-rule

• CipherTrace. (2023). Crypto Travel Rule Compliance Guide for VASPs. https://ciphertrace.com

• TRM Labs. (2024). Navigating the Global Regulatory Landscape for Travel Rule Compliance. https://trmlabs.com

• MarketGuard. (2025). Travel Rule Compliance for Crypto Businesses: Global Challenges and Solutions. https://marketguard.io/blog

• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2022). Virtual Assets and Anti-Money Laundering Guidelines. https://www.unodc.org